Slate’s Dear Prudence has some advice…

Dear Prudence,
I have been dating this guy for about three months. When we first met, I was struck by his gentleness and kindness. The sex is great. I can express myself, all my quirky idiosyncrasies included, and not fear judgment or ridicule. He understands me and accepts me as I am. Which is why I’m having such a hard time with this dilemma: I’ve never dated anyone so sensitive before. He has his bad days, as we all do, but his bad days make him cry. His mood spirals down into an abyss of self-hatred and emotional despair. I try to talk him out of it, and often I’m successful. He says that just seeing me and holding me boosts his mood considerably. I’ve tried to help him figure out how something like a tiff with his boss can make him feel like the world is ending. I’ve suggested therapy, but he gets defensive, and I don’t want to shatter the tiny bit of ego he has. The other (bigger) part of me just wants to yell, “For God’s sake, grow some balls!” When we started dating, I had the “wow, he could be the one” thoughts. Now, I can’t imagine spending my life with this man, having kids, etc., because I feel he’s weak and it disgusts me. It’s infuriating because the rest of him is so great. I love him and want to see where this can possibly go, but if I can’t find a way to overcome this, then I may as well end it now.

—Distressed

Once again, guys - no matter how much she says she wants you to be “sensitive”…

…she really doesn’t.  She wants a strong man.  With some testicles

She can’t help it; it’s coded into her.  And no matter how she tries to lie to herself, this is what she craves.  She may date you - even marry you - but sooner or later this guy is going to come along, and she’ll be banging him.

Better to just be this guy and stop buying the bullshit.

Now you know you’ve hit the big time when you get a Fatwa out against you.

Left column, just scroll down under “Fatwaworthy.”

Yeah. RIIIGHT.

Next time anyone wonders why “people like me” oppose this so vehemently is because we saw the same bullshit rhetoric in places like Canada.

$5000 Fine Sought For Christian Marriage Commissioner Who Declined Gay Couple

Also must pay own legal costs and would be liable for all court costs if he loses

By Hilary White

SASKATOON, April 19, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Canadian Christian civil marriage commissioner in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Orville Nichols, could face up to $5000 in fines for having referred a homosexual couple to a different commissioner.

Human Rights Commission lawyer Janice Gingell asked the tribunal to find that Nichols contravened the code and order him to pay $5,000 in compensation to the complainant.

The 70 year-old Mr. Nichols used a clearly religious-based conscience argument for his refusal, saying his faith guides his daily life, that he prays and reads the Bible every day. He told the Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal that his faith “takes first place” in his life. He said, “I couldn’t sleep or live with myself if I were to perform same-sex marriages.”

The other commissioner to whom the two men were referred performed the ceremony on the same date they requested of Mr. Nichols.

Nichols has said that he will not be among those who resign their commissions over the issue and that he is willing to take the matter to court. In Canadian Human Rights Tribunal cases, the party defending against a complaint is under a large disadvantage.

While the government pays the costs of the complainant, the defendant must cover his own expenses and if the ruling goes against him, is normally charged with all the costs. Further costs are incurred if he should try to bring the matter to a legal court.

The Tribunal, which is not under standard rules of evidence or judicial procedures, has yet to render a decision, though thus far, in most decisions in cases of this kind, the outcome has favoured the homosexual activists over religious conscientious objectors.

I know someone is going to whine, “But they are government employees…”

Note the bolded entries.  Nobody was denied services.  Nobody refused to refer them to someone else.

Someone just didn’t want to preside over a ceremony that was against their religious beliefs.  Just like the Muslims who get granted such accomodation up in Canuckistan.

And I am pretty damn sure, that faced with the possibility of lawsuits and riots (And protests by the leftards) that if Orville Nichols was Ahmed ibn Hassan or something, this wouldn’t even be on the radar.

So what happened?

1. Ben Dover and Phil MacCrevice went to a town hall or something (Whatever the Canadians call them) and got their “marriage” license.  It is important to note, unless Canuckia is different from every other western nation, they were at this point “married.” They did not need a ceremony.
2. They went down the hall to a comissioner, who demurred. He could have done so for a variety of reasons - busy, leaving - but it was not what he did, but why he did it that mattered.  This is “Thought Police” activity, no matter how you slice it.
3. The comissioner referred them to someone else. They went down the hall. They got their ceremony, and left.  They Were NOT *DENIED* Services. 

The only thing these two ass-bandits were refused was the right to force a Christian - or, as they are known now, a “Christofascist Xtian godbag” by liberals - to perform an optional ceremony.  to shove their particular brand ofmorals down his throat. To give him a hearty “IN YOUR FACE!!! Take THAT, Xian Scum!”

Now - no matter how fair minded you think you are, and no matter how often the butt-pirates and carpet-munchers claim “Oh, we just want equal rights, we don’t want to shove our lifestyle down anyone’s throat” - it’s bullshit. They said the same fuckin’ thing in Canada.  The same fuckin’ groups who are trying to get the same fuckin’ laws passed here. And look what is happening. Do what they claim, and what they do, match up?

No.  And what does that make it?

Lies.  So if you are buying their rhetoric, you are buying patent - and demonstrably so - untruths.

I’d like to apologize if I have made you face up to  some unpleasant truths - well, no, actually I don’t.  It’d be politically correct of me to do so; you know, ignore the real truth and support the public fiction.  As you know, though, I am not politically correct.  So if you want to stick your fingers in your ears, sing, “LA-LA-LA-LA-LA!” and ignore it … well, you have the right to be both wrong and stupid as a goddamn retarded turnip.

Whom does it benefit? To what end?  Government employees again?  The Canucks accomodate all manner of religious belief.  They don’t force Muslims to be hog inspectors.  They don’t make pagans work on their holy days. They don’t make Jews do things on their Sabbath.  But they do force - or try to force - Christians to do things against their beliefs and doctrines.  And you can rationalize that how you want - it still remains.

And the Queer Activists want to bring that here.  Your fuckin’ house is next.

This is why it is important to oppose special rights for homosexuals.  Because that is what they are - and you just have to look to our neighbors to see the REAL agenda of these fuckweasels.  This isn’t equal rights.  This isn’t live and let live.  They want lebensraum in your Sudetenland.  Once you start policing thought, of making special crimes of your beliefs, in hauling you in front of comissions for living according to those beliefs, of insuring that living according to them effectively removes you from a government job, you are a second class citizen.

The fascists learned the first time.  They don’t make the New Jews wear stars.  They don’t officially make you a second class citizen - they just make everyone else an animal more equal than you.  They are doing this through “hate (thought)  crime” legislation, and gay “marriage.”

Well, now you know.  You can argue with me all you want.  Just look at what they do.

By a reader - Gearhard - that I was graciously linked to by His Rottiness, Emperor Darth Misha I, over at the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler.

His Rottiness was most effusive in praise, for which I humbly say, “Thank You.”I read there regularly. Where I tend to go after morons with a rusty spoon, and leave them to bleed, Misha likes to eviscerate them in gruesome detail, rip off heads, and shit in lungs. And he is a true artiste at it, something that is breathtaking to behold.

So - my humble - aw, who the fuck am I trying to kid? - Anyway, I will return the favor. Misha has a capital idea. Simply SMASHING. Go read. No, CLICK HERE.

Yeah? Wasn’t that fun?

He’s on to something, I think. Civil disobedience. They want to call crass insults “Hate Crimes?” Give them all the damn “Hate Crimes” they can stand. Over-work the system. Shut it down, dead to a screeching halt.

Give them so many “hate crimes” thatthey have to let everyone off because the courts are so damned overworked that the right to a speedy trial can’t be fulfilled. Then - fuck them.

I like it. It’s elegant. It’s clever. And it is as mean as a fucking snake.

UPDATE: The Emperor drinks here for free. His money is no good.

*sigh*

Alright, Gearhard. I “lost” your tab. The next time, though, that you run one, you drink off the bottom shelf.

Yeah, the post title is cold-blooded, but… I gotta be me.  You have to find some humor and things to laugh at, not matter how black that humor and sad that laughter is. Otherwise you cry too damn much.

So, our little nutcase from Virginia Tech the other day sent NBC a video.   Okay.  Nutcases tend to do that, in one form or another.

And it is full of class hatred, left wing ranting.

It’s what happens when to teach someone to hate someone else because they have made something of themselves.  Instead of an ideology of “He’s “rich” so he just got lucky or cheated you, and deserves to pay for it” they might teach “He’s rich and  - hey - you can be too if you work hard enough for it.”

Might have a little less blood flowing.  When push comes to shove, though, ultimately the solution for socialists is to start the butchery of those they blame (The “Haves”) - whether it’s Marxists socialists in Russia, or National Socialists and their final solutions.  And if you think it is going to be any different here if they get in control, you are living in a dream world.

Now - on to the cry part of this.  If you can look at this and keep your eyes dry…

….then you really need to go out and buy a soul.

Damn you, Gary Varvel.

Or - why there was a two hour delay in tracking down the shooter at Virginia Tech. I think a fisking is in order.

After two people, Emily Jane Hilscher, a freshman, and Ryan Clark, the resident adviser whose room was nearby in the dormitory, were shot dead, the campus police began searching for Karl D. Thornhill, who was described in Internet memorials as Ms. Hilscher’s boyfriend.

Because, as we know, whenever a woman is murdered, it’s the boyfriend who did it. Or the Husband.

According to a search warrant filed by the police, Ms. Hilscher’s roommate had told the police that Mr. Thornhill, a student at nearby Radford University, had guns at his town house. The roommate told the police that she had recently been at a shooting range with Mr. Thornhill, the affidavit said, leading the police to believe he may have been the gunman.

Those darn gun-owners. It’s such suspicious behavior, legally owning a firearm.

But as they were questioning Mr. Thornhill, reports of widespread shooting at Norris Hall came in, making it clear that they had not contained the threat on campus. Mr. Thornhill was not arrested, although he continues to be an important witness in the case, the police said.

OOOOOOOOPS!

At the time of the dormitory shootings, Col. W. Steven Flaherty, the superintendent of the Virginia State Police, said, “There was certainly no evidence or no reason to think that there was anyone else at that particular point in time.”

Um … Colonel? Usually helps to actually LOOK for evidence. Just a thought. I know it is cheap and easy to just jump to conclusions and tag the man, but some small pretense of some actual police work might be in order.

State officials continued to defend the actions of the campus authorities. John W. Marshall, the Virginia secretary of public safety, said Charles W. Steger, the president of Virginia Tech, and Chief Wendell Flinchum of the campus police “made the right decisions based on the best information that they had available at the time.”

Gee. Govenment officials closing ranks and excusing their own.

There’s a shock.

At an afternoon news briefing, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine said Dr. Steger had asked him to appoint a committee to examine the university’s response and try to answer some of the remaining questions about the gunman’s actions.

In other words, exoneration of the guilty, punishment of the innocent, and citations of merit for the non-participants.

Same old, same old.

Oh - lest I disappoint the femherroid trolls who prowl here - let’s see - who is the biggest proponent of “blame the man first?” That’s right. Feminists. You can thank them in a good part that two dead turned into thirty-three dead. But hey - the meme was followed. All hail the ideology.

Consider them thirty one sacrifices to the Goddess.

Went over to Pandagon - I do this so you won’t have to - and read some of Amynda Crotchrot’s latest drivel where she asks us to imagine if the pro-gun people are right.  Then the ol’ cum-guzzler (Hey - she described herself that way!) imagines that college students can carry guns - and reminds us that it was a college student with a gun who killed people.

Allright, Amynda - let’s fucking imagine you are right and the answer is more gun control, and prohibiting people from carrying weapons in places like universities and such…

Oh - we don’t have to imagine much, do we? We know how fucking well *THAT* worked.

Back In January, a bill died in the State legislature… well, you read it…

Gun bill gets shot down by panel

HB 1572, which would have allowed handguns on college campuses, died in subcommittee.

By Greg Esposito
381-1675

A bill that would have given college students and employees the right to carry handguns on campus died with nary a shot being fired in the General Assembly.

House Bill 1572 didn’t get through the House Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety. It died Monday in the subcommittee stage, the first of several hurdles bills must overcome before becoming laws.

The bill was proposed by Del. Todd Gilbert, R-Shenandoah County, on behalf of the Virginia Citizens Defense League. Gilbert was unavailable Monday and spokesman Gary Frink would not comment on the bill’s defeat other than to say the issue was dead for this General Assembly session.

Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker was happy to hear the bill was defeated. “I’m sure the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly’s actions because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on our campus.”

Del. Dave Nutter, R-Christiansburg, would not comment Monday because he was not part of the subcommittee that discussed the bill.

Most universities in Virginia require students and employees, other than police, to check their guns with police or campus security upon entering campus. The legislation was designed to prohibit public universities from making “rules or regulations limiting or abridging the ability of a student who possesses a valid concealed handgun permit … from lawfully carrying a concealed handgun.”

The legislation allowed for exceptions for participants in athletic events, storage of guns in residence halls and military training programs.

Last spring a Virginia Tech student was disciplined for bringing a handgun to class, despite having a concealed handgun permit. Some gun owners questioned the university’s authority, while the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police came out against the presence of guns on campus.

In June, Tech’s governing board approved a violence prevention policy reiterating its ban on students or employees carrying guns and prohibiting visitors from bringing them into campus facilities.

I really don’t think I need to elaborate beyond my emphasis in the story, do I?

UPDATE: I guess I do.

I’m sorry - I guess I should make myself clear so I don’t get snark letters.

Yes, you gun-grabbing, libtard fucks, I blame you. I blame Sarah Brady and you you other weak-sister statist cockroaches who ought to be snuffed out so free people can live free. You bedwetting, sanctimonious, preening fuckweasels, as far as I am concerned, have blood on your hands and are culpable in these murders.

This is what happens, you mental defectives, when you disarm people and then fucking advertise it. It’s canned fucking hunting for the goblins out there.

One person armed. Two rounds of .45 ACP dead center body mass. And that would have ended it. And all your wailing, pissing and moaning, and doomsaying about “The Wild West” is bullshit. Every one of your precious fucking “Gun Free Cities” is a fucking cesspool of murder - and where people are allowed to carry guns, moreso when concealed, moreso when “Stand Your Ground” laws are in effect, the fucking murder rate drops to astonishingly low levels. Why? Think about it for a minute, Captain Obvious - would you go into some place and so much as pull out a stick if you thought a good chunk of people there might be armed and inclined to blow your ass to the Hell you so richly deserve to burn in?

Do you get it now, El Stupido? Do I have to break out the son-of-a-bitching crayolas for you, lump of fucking coal for brains?

People who get guns generally learn how to use them. We take courses. We build our skills. I know it’s hard to comprehend since blobs of quivering, useless, fucking protoplasm like yourselves tend to piss down your legs and collapse in heaps of moaning lard when junior goes “bang bang” with one of his blocks, but we learn to use our tools, so that Pray Jesus God we never have to use them - but if we have to, we can. Unlike you, you limp-wristed, puling gang of fucking pussies.

33 people dead. Because shit-for-brains candy-asses like you have decided it is too risky to allow people to defend themselves and be responsible for their own safety. I hope the wailing of their ghosts, and the crying of their loved ones haunt you for a long fucking time.

And there is not enough bleach in the world to wash the blood off your hands. You all make me fucking sick. Piss on the whole sorry and sanctimonious lot of you.

And as if I couldn’t get any more worked up and frothing at the mouth, I see on the news a bunch of mewling scared bunnies talking about how this underlines a need for a more serious dialog about gun control. Well, you have it half-right, you pustulant pantywastes; thing is what needs to be done to make it more serious is for you fucktards to cure your cranio-rectal inversion.  I wonder if enough Swats of Gonz’s Patented Clue-By-Four O’Doom might serve to extricate your collective heads from your collective asses long enough for you to - for once - consider that you might be not only wrong, but that doing the same old thing over and over is more than fucking stupid as a sack of hammers, but counterproductive as well?

All your precious gun-grabbing laws did fuck all to keep guns out of the hands of this clown.  You have a 2600 acre campus, and the on-site campus police were useless - FUCKING USELESS - in keeping this guy from butchering almost three dozen people. (And yet you butt-nuggets persist in the idiotic belief that an even more over-worked and thin spread police force in a city will insure your safety).  In fact, all they did was insure that people who could otherwise legally carry guns - you know, the people who are inclined to obey the law, instead of ignore it and blow away 33 people - were helpless to protect anyone.

“But, there’s no evidence of that, Gonz…”  No?  NO,  YOU PRATTLING IMBECILE?!?!?!  Au contraire.  I beg to differ.  Excuse me whilst I channel Rush Limbaugh and post here what I have in my currently nicotine stained fingers.  Ahem.  From the Roanoake Times (Same place, amazing what you can find browsing a site.)

Unarmed and vulnerable

Bradford B. Wiles

Wiles, of New Castle, is a graduate student at Virginia Tech.

On Aug. 21 at about 9:20 a.m., my graduate-level class was evacuated from the Squires Student Center. We were interrupted in class and not informed of anything other than the following words: “You need to get out of the building.”

Upon exiting the classroom, we were met at the doors leading outside by two armor-clad policemen with fully automatic weapons, plus their side arms. Once outside, there were several more officers with either fully automatic rifles and pump shotguns, and policemen running down the street, pistols drawn.

It was at this time that I realized that I had no viable means of protecting myself.

Please realize that I am licensed to carry a concealed handgun in the commonwealth of Virginia, and do so on a regular basis. However, because I am a Virginia Tech student, I am prohibited from carrying at school because of Virginia Tech’s student policy, which makes possession of a handgun an expellable offense, but not a prosecutable crime.

I had entrusted my safety, and the safety of others to the police. In light of this, there are a few things I wish to point out.

First, I never want to have my safety fully in the hands of anyone else, including the police.

Second, I considered bringing my gun with me to campus, but did not due to the obvious risk of losing my graduate career, which is ridiculous because had I been shot and killed, there would have been no graduate career for me anyway.

Third, and most important, I am trained and able to carry a concealed handgun almost anywhere in Virginia and other states that have reciprocity with Virginia, but cannot carry where I spend more time than anywhere else because, somehow, I become a threat to others when I cross from the town of Blacksburg onto Virginia Tech’s campus.

Of all of the emotions and thoughts that were running through my head that morning, the most overwhelming one was of helplessness.

That feeling of helplessness has been difficult to reconcile because I knew I would have been safer with a proper means to defend myself.

I would also like to point out that when I mentioned to a professor that I would feel safer with my gun, this is what she said to me, “I would feel safer if you had your gun.”

The policy that forbids students who are legally licensed to carry in Virginia needs to be changed.

I am qualified and capable of carrying a concealed handgun and urge you to work with me to allow my most basic right of self-defense, and eliminate my entrusting my safety and the safety of my classmates to the government.

This incident makes it clear that it is time that Virginia Tech and the commonwealth of Virginia let me take responsibility for my safety.

But, if that’s not enough, look what Larry Hincker had to say a few days later.  Yes, that Larry-fucking-Hincker.  The same stupid motherfucker who was talking about how “safe” everyone would “feel.”  And yes, that is stupid motherfucker as in your fellow gun-grabbing fascist cocksucker.

Imagine if students were armed

Larry Hincker

Hincker is the associate vice president for university relations at Virginia Tech.

Funny how “Virginia Tech” keeps popping up

After the fear, and dare I say, panic from the events of Aug. 21, it is absolutely mind-boggling to see the opinions of Bradford Wiles (”Unarmed and vulnerable,” Aug. 31).

Someone disagreeing with you, eh wot? Not something you’re used to in your echo-chamber ivory tower, is it?

I once worked for an out-of-touch manager who gave rather absurd directions. My colleagues and I would do as directed and dubbed it “malicious compliance,” knowing the task to be inane and the manager’s foibles would soon be apparent.

Which is why you’re now a drone in academia, parroting the bullshit party line.  Now we know what the training to be a brain-dead liberal assmaggot is.

The editors of this page must have printed this commentary if for no other reason than malicious compliance. Surely, they scratched their heads saying, “I can’t believe he really wants to say that.”

I’m scratching my head wondering how anyone as fucking butt-stupid as yourself survived to adulthood, let alone made vice-president of so much as shit-shoveling.  If I was your father, I’d have drowned you long ago.

Wiles tells us that he didn’t feel safe with the hundreds of highly trained officers armed with high powered rifles encircling the building and protecting him. He even implies that he needed his sidearm to protect himself against the officers.

They were really fucking effective Monday, weren’t they, teach?  33 instances of “Safe.”  If that’s your idea of safe, fuckwidget, shove it up your ass.

On that fateful Monday, campus was understandably on edge. Elvis-type sightings of the escaped prisoner around campus were rampant. People were legitimately concerned about where he might be. And although the police were relatively confident they had the suspect cornered (they were ultimately proved right), the anxiety level elsewhere on campus was very high.

Panic calls from within the Squires Student Center quickly morphed from facts into rumors, including a frantic call alleging a hostage situation. The police had no choice but to move a massive force from the manhunt site to that side of campus to deal with the hostage rumor.

And this has WHAT do do with your point?  Or do you just like to hear your “Hey, my ideas got 33 people FUCKING KILLED” brand of wisdom repeated out loud in your own dulcet tones? I’m sure you’re in love with yourself.  I hope so, then at least someone would, because I’m sure the families of 33 dead people would like to see you in a gibbet with the crows pecking out the eyes from your decaying corpse.  I know I would.

The writer would have us believe that a university campus, with tens of thousands of young people, is safer with everyone packing heat. Imagine the continual fear of students in that scenario. We’ve seen that fear here, and we don’t want to see it again.

How about inagining the fear of students sitting helpless like fish in a fucking barrel in a chained up building while someone blew their asses away thanks to your inane and fascist policies?  How about that, Larry?  Huh?  No answer?  Fuck you.

Who among us thinks the writer of the commentary would not have been directly in harm’s way if he showed himself to those tactical squads while displaying a deadly weapon? Would he even be here today to tell us the story? Contrary to his position, the writer’s commentary actually gives credence to the university policy preventing weapons in classrooms.

The writer of this, after putting the aforementioned two rounds of .45 ACp squarely center body mass, would probably do what I would do - set his weapon down, and sit away from it so he wouldn’t be a fucking accident. You’re projecting your stupidity, Larry.

Guns don’t belong in classrooms. They never will. Virginia Tech has a very sound policy preventing same.

Worked real well, didn’t it, you moronic baboon?

So, I am sick to death of the Sarah Brady crowd and their bleating about”Gun Control.”  Gun control is about using two hands to steady your aim.  Had anyone with a modicum of training been available, this would have ended a lot quicker and a lot less bloody.

So stop writing me dumb shit about how this would have been prevented with more “Gun Control.”  We have  thosands of useless gun control out there now.  It never takes guns out of the hands of the people you are worried about, but only out of the hands of people who might do you some good.

33 People.  Christ on a crutch.  Totally preventable if you assbags would stop trying to castrate America - and American men especially.  Take your gun control and stick it up your ass - sideways.  Want my guns?

Come get them.  You can have the bullets first, then if you are still above room temperature you are welcome to pry them out of my cold and stiff fingers.  Think for a minute though, dumbass, that I and people like me might be a lot better at this violence thing than you sissies.  Like Brad Wiles, I choose to be responsible for my own safety, since you fucks are worthless as is self evident.

And bring body bags.

Lots and lots of body bags.

Hippy-Chick Vanessa from “Feminaziing” reports that some UK doctors don’t do abortions. 

And worse yet, are specializing in fields that don’t go anywhere NEAR a woman’s reproductive system.

Jesus, Vanessa, what the fuck do you want? Women to have the ability to stop any doctor and demand on the threat of imprisonment that they give you an abortion?

This is an example of Zealotry from the Church of the Pro-Aborts.  Islamofascists on Jihad can’t match their zeal when it comes to their favorite sacrament.

Don Ho died the other day.

Don Imus got fired for calling the Rutger’s Women’s Basketball team a bunch of Ho’s.

Since then there has be a call to get rid of the word “Ho” in the public life.

Coincidence?

I THINK NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Someone needs to question Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson about this - and account for the whereabouts of their goons on that day.

I need to go to Florida and search for the real muderer on the GolF Courses with OJ. I will not rest until I get to the bottom of this.

No Justice - No Peace!

Protein Wisdom smacks down on Samhita from “Feminastying.”

Priceless:

Squaring the Globe nails it as a Modern Day Witch Hunt

Maggie’s Farm takes on the state of denial of leftist intellegentsia.

It strikes close to home for Susan Boyer.

Emperor Darth Misha I at the Rottweiler Empire dismembers CRYSTAL GAIL MANGUM

 Ace of Spades Skewers the nappy-haired ho as well.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.  Except for the charge of Rape.

Well, that’s the way feminists wish the Constitution was written, anyway.

Let’s get one thing straight.  Cooper, the guy who took over the clusterfuck that Mike “Nodong” Nifong fucked up like a soup sandwich, did not say that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute.  He did not use any weasel words.  He said the Duke 3 were INNOCENT. And that the event NEVER HAPPENED.

However you slice it, Crystal Gail Mangum is a lying sack of shit.  And a Nappy-haired Ho.  (I throw that in because it seems to be the worst thing you can call someone and can scar them for life.  Is it working?  I hope the fuck so.)  I’ve asked a few women over the past few days, “Hey - you ever been in doubt you were having sex?  Ever confuse getting laid with something else?”  The answer is a universal no.  What this means, if you are one of these assbags who still insists that Crystal Gail Mangum had even a nodding acquaintance with the truth, is that she has no grip on reality and is nuttier than a squirrel turd.

And a Nappy-Haired Ho.  But I digress.

We have one lesson to learn from the Duke Fiasco.

Yes, Virginia, Some Women do LIE about rape.  Not that we really needed to learn this if we go all the way back to Tawana Brawley, and the many, many men who have been released from prison after a recanted accusation or DNA evidence proving it impossible.  But I hope this very public cock-up has branded it into the American Psyche.  I will do my best to heat the brand.

Now, Feminists, bless their black and mendacious little hearts, will try to say that this means that I say ALL women who say they are raped are liars.  And this is manifestly not true.  Lets compare and contrast real quick:

• Some Women lie about Rape
• All Women who claim to be raped are liars.

Hmm. Doesn’t look the same to me.  Well, who can figure their thought process out?  If they could think, they wouldn’t be feminists.

Now, since some women do lie about rape, this means that not all accusations are true.  Which means holding an accusation as evidence is dumb as a sack of hair.  So - we need this little thing that centuries of jurisprudence have come to call EVIDENCE.  This evidence needs to be presented to a jury, and he gets to confront his accuser.  This doesn’t even account for faulty or misleading ID’s or evidence.

I know. DAMN that pesky Constitution!

So - next time the Feminist Inquisitors pull on their black robes, gather in the Star Chamber, and commence to hunting them some witches - just keep in this in mind.  Remember how good their track record is.  Remember how well they accepted innocence with grace.

And then judge them accordingly.

Over the months, thinking on the (inevitable) conclusion that had to some from the Duke “rape” fiasco, I always thought I’d feel a sense of relief for the men who were falsely accused by this contemptible woman, Crystal Gail Mangum - or rather, Janette Rivers. Crystal Gail Mangum is the name she uses as a stripper. And whore.

Towering Rage. That’s what I am really feeling.

Where to start? Where to begin? I feel like I could curse her for two full days before I begin to repeat myself.

Nappy-haired ho? Suddenly the Don Imus thing seems oddly appropriate. Have that leftist windbag get his ass in a sling for using the term, then have a real one show up. Karma doing a little compare and contrast.

Seriously - think about this. Don Imus uses a bad-taste insult about a bunch of black girls, and he’s off the air. Gone. Like *that*! A black slut falsely accuses 3 boys of a horrific crime and it takes over a year for their name to be cleared. Jail. Humiliation. Lawyers, and expulsion, and having their pictures and names dragged through the mud…

And we’re supposed to believe that minorities, women, the “poor” are powerless. Looks to me like the white males have no power in either case, but guess who does seem to have a lot of power? Hell, Crystal Gail Mangum will get off scot-fucking-free.

Not a damn thing will happen to her. Fuck up three kids lives and not a damn. Fucking. Thing.

Well, she doesn’t get a pass from me. Or here.

Here’s the nasty bitch. Here’s what a false accusing cum-dumpster looks like. Crystal Gail Mangum, and here’s hoping she gets what is coming to her, and in wholesale quantities. I’m not going to call for this oxygen theif to be put out of our misery; though God knows it would improve the quality of the gene pool by at least a percentage point. I’ll tell you what, though - if she were to turn up in a ditch with a bullet in her head, I sure as hell aren’t going to be for wasting the money to track down who did her in, and I’ll put topics on this blog just so I can file it under “Public Improvements.”

Let’s take a look at this poster child for female victimhood, taken from the net:

1. DNA results revealed that she had sex with a man who was not a Duke lacrosse player. Attorney Joseph Cheshire said the tests indicated DNA from a “single male source” came from a vaginal swab taken from Mangum. Media outlets reported that this DNA was from her boyfriend.
2. A DNA report released in December 2006 revealed that sperm from several males was found in her body and on her underwear; none of which was from any of the Duke players. Mangum has denied engaging in any sexual activity in the days before the assault, saying that she last had sex a week earlier. She also said that her attackers did not use condoms and ejaculated.
3. She had made a similar claim in the past which she did not pursue. “On Aug. 18, 1996, the dancer - then 18 years old - told a police officer in Creedmoor she had been raped by three men in June 1993, according to a police document. She did not pursue the allegations. The officer who took the woman’s report 10 years ago asked her to write a detailed timeline of the night’s events and bring the account back to the police. “Apparently she never returned,” Granville County DA Sam Currin said.”
4. She told authorities that in 1998, her husband threatened to kill her. However, she did not appear at the court hearing and thus the charges were dropped.
5. She frequently passed out while performing as an exotic dancer at the Platinum Club in Hillsborough, according to the former club manager. The former manager also stated that Mangum had to be dragged out of the establishment onto gravel either one or two nights prior to the March 13th party: “She was heavy. It took four or five of us to carry her outside. She was dead weight. That’s how passed out she was. She never woke up. We could have put the scratches on her. That could be how she got them.” The former manager went on to describe the accuser as “a club employee whose problems with other dancers and customers sometimes made it hard for her to make money,” citing an event in which she started to pull a female customer’s hair.
6. According to the Platinum Club owner, she danced at the club on March 23, 24, and 25. Those were the same dates she told doctors she was “in excruciating pain from the … beating.” The owner said the accuser did not say anything about being raped 10 days earlier. Similarly, 60 Minutes released a video of her allegedly dancing at the club less than two weeks after the alleged incident, again leading to the media doubting how traumatized and in pain she actually was.
7. The strip club’s security officer said that the accuser told co-workers four days after the alleged incident that she “was going to get money from some boys at a Duke party who had not paid her,” adding that she essentially said, “I’m going to get paid by the white boys.” The security guard did not make a big deal of it “because no one takes her seriously.”
8. In 2002, she stole a taxi from a man to whom she was giving a lap dance. A high speed chase then ensued, and when the deputy chasing her approached the stolen taxi on foot, she tried to run over him. She pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of larceny, speeding to elude arrest, assault on a government official and driving while impaired. She was sentenced to 3 weekends in detention.

Jesus. She makes Paris Hilton look like Mary Fucking Poppins.

And let’s not overlook her story. Or stories. She has more than Stephen King.

1. Durham police said Mangum “kept changing her story and is not credible,” reporting that she initially told them she was raped by 20 white men, later reducing the number to only three.
2. Another police report states that the accuser initially claimed she was only groped, rather than raped, but changed her story before going to the hospital.
3. The second stripper who performed at the house, Kim Roberts, said that Mangum was not raped. She stated that the accuser “obviously was not hurt … because she was fine.” Likewise, she refuted other aspects of the accuser’s story including denying that she helped dress the accuser after the alleged incident and saying that they were not forcefully separated by players like the accuser reported.
4. Mangum did not consistently choose the same three defendants in the photo lineups. Media reports have disclosed at least two photo lineups that occurred in March and April. In the March lineup, she did not choose Dave Evans at all. There was only one individual she identified as her assailant with 100% certainty during both procedures - Brad Ross. After being identified, Ross provided to police investigators indisputable evidence that he was with his girlfriend at North Carolina State University before, during, and after the party through cell phone records and a sworn affidavit from a witness.
5. A police report released June 23, 2006, said that Mangum initially claimed she was “attacked by five men … and changed her story several times.”
6. On December 22, 2006, Nifong dropped the rape charges after Mangum stated that “she was penetrated from behind … but did not know with what.” In North Carolina, penetration with an object is considered sexual assault, not rape.
7. On January 11, 2007, several more inconsistencies came to light after the defense filed a motion detailing her interview on December 21, 2006. For example, she changed details about when she was attacked, who attacked her, and how they attacked her:

1. Mangum claims she was attacked from 11:35 p.m. to midnight, much earlier than her previous accusations. This new timing is before the well-documented alibi evidence for Reade Seligmann that places him away from the house. However, the defense revealed that this new timing would suggest Seligmann was on the phone with his girlfriend during the height of the attack. Additionally, she received an incoming call at 11:36 p.m. and somebody stayed on the line for 3 minutes, which would be during the alleged attack according to the new timetable.
2. The new statement contradicts time stamped photos that show her dancing between 12:00 and 12:04 a.m. It would also mean that they stayed at the party for nearly an hour after the supposed attack since Kim Roberts drove her away at 12:53 a.m. In her April statement, Mangum said they left immediately after the attack.
3. Mangum changed the names of her alleged attackers, saying they used multiple pseudonyms. While Dave Evans went by “Dan, Adam and Brett,” Reade Seligmann used the names “Adam and Matt,” while Collin Finnerty either did not have a name or was not called by name, Mangum claimed.
4. The accuser also changed her description of Evans. She previously claimed that she was attacked by a man that looked like Evans except with a “mustache,” but more recently stated that the assailant just had a “five o’clock shadow.”
5. Mangum claimed that Evans stood in front of her, making her perform oral sex on him. Previously, she stated that Seligmann did this. In the latest statement, she stated that Seligmann “did not commit any sex act on her … [H]e said he could not participate because he was getting married.” Although he has a girlfriend, there has never been anything to suggest he was engaged or getting married.

And finally, In its own investigation, The News & Observer, North Carolina’s second largest newspaper, determined that the accuser gave at least five different versions of the alleged rape to police and medical interviewers.

Of course, let’s not just heap all the blame on CRYSTAL GAIL MANGUM. Mike Nifong, indicted, vote seeking, race panderer was in a big hurry to bring a “po black chile” some “justice” to win votes for his re-election. The “Gang of 88″ was in a big fucking hurry to hound, harass, and lynch these boys. And feminists everywhere are still in denial.

Which well they should be - the silence, again, is deafening from the feminist blogosphere. And if nobody knows why - or even if you do - I will say it out loud:

IT’S BECAUSE FEMINISTS HAVE CREATED THIS SICK AND TWISTED WITCH HUNT CLIMATE TO BEGIN WITH. They’ve pushed for rape shield laws that have had the effect of hiding a false accuser from any accountability for their actions. They whine and plead that such women as CRYSTAL GAIL MANGUM should get off with no consequences because of some bogus “chilling effect.” (Yeah - punish false accusers and what might happen? Other false accusers might not jump out to level charges against their favorite whipping boy for the evils of the world - men. Oh, horrors. Well we can’t have THAT, can we?) And the few feminists who have been speaking out have all been excusing her.

Well, you’re all scum. Choke on it. Choke on it that you have pontificated on it, preached, and been sanctimonious twats over the past year and some change. Choke on it that you are suckers, and fell for the lies and manipulations of a scumbag. And choke on it that you did it because she was black and female. Just like your “KKKlansman” boogeymen who believe anyone because they are white male good ole boys.

That would be Racist. And Sexist. And while it’s an ugly damn shoe, it sure fits you all real well.

Here’s anothjer thing you can choke on, too. This scuzzbucket you have championed has set your cause back immeasurably, the more so for your constant harping on it. I wouldn’t be surprised to find some of your draconian laws you have pushed to put the screws to men rolled back - I’m not holding my breath, but there is real hope there.

And one more thing you can choke down - along with that helping of crow you are eating. One day another woman will actually be raped. And their rapists will walk free after invoking a new incantation: Crystal Gail Mangum.

I am sure they will thank you, then. Yeah, your blind, lemming-like, blinkered, knee-jerk support for this ho simply because of her race and sex has left your credibility and moral voice in tatters and shreds. You have given your foes a mighty weapon of righteous indignation from which to speak loudly. And I know I will use it as often as I can, for one.

You can rage all you want about “privilege” but the fact remains that if it wasn;’t for privilege these young men would have been up shit creek without a paddle long ago, sold out more than likely by an underpaid and overworked public defender who didn’t have the time for it, or failed by one who didn’t have the resources.

But don’t worry, ladies. Even if you can’t “nail” well-off white men, maybe all the poorer black men your hateful and misandric laws have shafted will make you sleep easier of nights.

Screw you all.

Oh - before I forget, one last thing:

We Told You So.

CHARGES DROPPED!!!

“The result of our review and investigation shows clearly that there is insufficient evidence to proceed on any of the charges, today we are filing notices of dismissal for all charges. We believe these cases were a result of a tragic rush to accuse and failure to verify serious allegations. Based on the significant inconsistencies in the evidence and the various accounts given by the accusing witness, we believe these three individuals are innocent of these charges.”

Innocent.

Not “We can’t convict them.” Innocent.

Screw you, Mike Nifong.

Hey - can we call “Crystal Gail Magnum,” Aka Janette Rivers, a nappy haired ho?

And do note that the Feminutzis are conspicuously silent on this, expecially the finding of the state Ag that no such attack ever took place.

And to think; years ago I could have accepted a teaching job in this diocese,

Bishop David Ricken has instructed the parish priest that due to the lesbian couple going very public with their sin - so much so that the local paper ran pictures of them with ashes on their forehead from Ash Wednesday - that they were henceforth to be denied communion.  In this politically correct culture this is an act of profound courage, and I salute him for it.  G0d grant us more such bishops in the Catholic Church.

Note that this doesn’t say “bar the sinner (sick) from the doors of the church (hospital),” though I am sure queer apologists will will attempt to paint it as such.

It’s the same thing I say with politicians who like to parade their “faith” at every photo opportunity.  You want to use the church?  Expect the church to demand you be in line with the teachings of the church.  Don’t want to be in line with the teachings of the church?  Stop wearing it on your sleeve as if you are a true believer, for the respect iot gives you.

I’d much rather have a smaller church of more solid and orthodox fauith than a mega church full of heretics and dissenters.

Yeah, it’s petty, but I love it when they get slapped down.

The Charge Of The Light Brigade
by Alfred, Lord Tennyson Memorializing Events in the Battle of Balaclava, October 25, 1854
Written 1854

Half a league half a league,
Half a league onward,
All in the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred:
‘Forward, the Light Brigade!
Charge for the guns’ he said:
Into the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred.

‘Forward, the Light Brigade!’
Was there a man dismay’d ?
Not tho’ the soldier knew
Some one had blunder’d:
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do & die,
Into the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred.

Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon in front of them
Volley’d & thunder’d;
Storm’d at with shot and shell,
Boldly they rode and well,
Into the jaws of Death,
Into the mouth of Hell
Rode the six hundred.

Flash’d all their sabres bare,
Flash’d as they turn’d in air
Sabring the gunners there,
Charging an army while
All the world wonder’d:
Plunged in the battery-smoke
Right thro’ the line they broke;
Cossack & Russian
Reel’d from the sabre-stroke,
Shatter’d & sunder’d.
Then they rode back, but not
Not the six hundred.

Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon behind them
Volley’d and thunder’d;
Storm’d at with shot and shell,
While horse & hero fell,
They that had fought so well
Came thro’ the jaws of Death,
Back from the mouth of Hell,
All that was left of them,
Left of six hundred.

When can their glory fade?
O the wild charge they made!
All the world wonder’d.
Honour the charge they made!
Honour the Light Brigade,
Noble six hundred!

Once upon a time, an Iranian frigate trying to fuck with Royal Marines and the Royal Navy would have had their heads handed to them.

*sigh*

In new Jersey, we are treated to a Terrorist drill where the terrorists are - get this - two members of an imaginary “Christian Group” taking ten hostages because one of their own had been expelled for praying before class.

Now this is only half believable. While I could believe that someone could be expelled for praying - because it has happened - I find the whole idea of Militant Baptists assaulting a school and taking hostage a little bit far fetched. What’s next? Machine-Gun toting Quakers? Perhaps a renegade group of Amish people threatening to detonate a nuke?

But this isn’t the first time. Michelle Malkin reported years ago of a band of Militant Homeschoolers blowing up a bus - at least in the namby-pamby, PC Left wing’s masturbatory fantasies for their drill in Michigan.

Oh, yea. I remember back when the NYC Metropolitan Museum of art had the Elephant Dung painting of the Virgin Mary, Armed and Militant Catholics (Hiss, boo!) Rampaged worldwide, rioting and killing -people for days, with the Pope issuing Papal Bulls calling for the beheading of the artist, and promising indulgences to assure them of entry into heaven. And who could forget the world upheaval over “Piss Christ?”

Oh, yeah. That’s right. The Catholics didn’t do that. They wrote letters and appeared on talk shows to express their disapproval. Now - who am I confusing those evil, christofascist godbags with?

Oh. That would be MUSLIMS. That’s right. However could I forget? You know, the so-called “Religion of Peace Piss” which is the only one where world leaders of its mainstream advocate bombs and killing children to achieve political goals.

I guess it’s just safer to offend, insult, and smear people who will pray for you rather than those who might grab your children off the street, behead them, and post a video of it up on YouTube. Kind of like when PETA folk protest rich old women in fur coats, and assault them in the street, but steer well clear of the Hell’s Angels and their leather jackets.

Yeah - those cowardly, bedwetting twits.

Or rather, Pirated From Emperor Darth Misha I

It’s too good not to use.

Item one: Rudy Guilani

The fucker is toast. An indifferent “pro-choice” I can live with. A socialist assbag who insists that non-specified “rights” have to be subsidized by Fedgov, Inc. - I can’t. And if he’s bad here, he’ll do it elsewhere.

Here’s an idea, Rudy - I have a specific right to keep and bear arms. How about I send you a bill for my firearms and all the associated expenses? You know, range time, ammunition, my cases - all that?

Yeah, thought so you pandering fucktard.

Item two: Iran and the Pussified Kingdom Of Great Britain

Yes, I am happy that fifteen British Sailors were released. Hurray.

Iran and their terrorist president won. They tweaked the nose of a once great people, and got away with it, appear like great heroes to the rest of the Islamofascists, and proved the Brits are pussies now.

Of course, on the upside they have proved just exactly how fucking useless the United Nations is, the bunch of twittering nincompoops. How incompetant can an organization be?

They never would have pulled this shit on Maggie Thatcher - I can just see her telluing her Chief of Staff “Dear me, this simply won’t do. Be a dear and take the military and do what you have to in order that the President of Iran calls me as early as possible and that I have his undivided attention.”

Of course, Tony Blair’s wife wears his balls for earrings, so what do you expect?

Appeasement didn’t work in the Sudetenland in the thirties, and it won’t work today.

Item Three: Nancy Pelosi in Syria

The Traitorous Bitch(tm) should be hung for treason. End of story.

Item Four: Bush names an ambassador rejected by the Senate on political grounds as a recess appointment.

He must have accidentally ingested a testosterone pill. I’m sure it will wear off soon.

That’s all for now.